Friday, April 26, 2024
HomeHealth ConditionsHypertensionDoes Intensive Blood Pressure Control Affect the Risk of Kidney Disease?

Does Intensive Blood Pressure Control Affect the Risk of Kidney Disease?

In a follow-up analysis of the SPRINT study, investigators looked at the effects of intensive blood pressure control on the risk of chronic kidney disease.

As the heart pumps the blood around the body, it is at a certain pressure within the blood vessels.

Blood pressure measurement records two pressure levels: the systolic blood pressure (SBP) when the heart is contracting, and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when the heart is relaxed.

Normal resting blood pressure is a SBP of up to 120 mmHg and a DBP of up to 80 mmHg. If a person’s resting blood pressure is consistently higher than this, it may start to damage body organs and place the individual at an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease.

Antihypertensive medications are used to decrease blood pressure to reduce the risk of damaging body organs. SBP has been shown to be a more important cardiovascular disease risk factor than DBP.

However, the target level for SBP in blood pressure treatment is unclear.

There has been much research on this question, bearing in mind that target SBP levels may vary between different subgroups of patients, depending on whether they have other medical conditions.

In addition, any benefits of more intensive treatment need to be balanced against the potential side effects of a higher number and dosage of antihypertensive drugs.

The SPRINT Study (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) set out to look at the effects of intensive SBP control (where antihypertensive medication was adjusted monthly to achieve a target SBP of less than 120 mmHg) versus standard SBP control (where antihypertensive treatment was adjusted monthly to achieve a target SBP of between 135-139 mmHg) on outcomes in patients who did not have diabetes or a history of previous stroke.

The trial was stopped early after about three years of follow-up because intensive SBP control resulted in a significantly greater reduction in heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease.

However, there was a concern that intensive SBP control could affect kidney function, as filtration in the kidneys is highly dependent on hydrostatic pressure.

In fact, in the SPRINT Study, the intensive SBP treatment group had a 3.5-fold higher risk of developing signs of chronic kidney disease over the course of the study.

The investigators analyzed this subgroup of patients to better understand the effects of intensive SBP control on the kidneys.

They recently published their findings in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The main SPRINT Study compared the effects of intensive SBP control versus standard SBP control in 9,361 participants at 102 clinical centers in the USA and Puerto Rico.

This subanalysis was performed on 6,662 of SPRINT participants who had no evidence of kidney disease at the start of the trial. Kidney health was measured by testing the glomerular filtration rate.

After three years, signs of chronic kidney disease occurred in 3.7% of the intensive control group, compared with 1% of the standard therapy group.

However, none of the participants who developed signs of chronic kidney disease progressed to end-stage kidney failure.

In addition, about 25% of those with chronic kidney disease in the intensive therapy group recovered their kidney function. Conversely, those in the intensive treatment group had only a 4.9% incidence of either a cardiovascular event (such as heart attack or stroke) or death, compared with 7.1% in the standard treatment group.

The researchers concluded that although intensive treatment increased the risk of chronic kidney disease, the significance of this was outweighed by the benefit of decreased cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

However, the long-term consequences of intensive SBP lowering on kidney function need to be established.

It will also be important for doctors to balance of the benefits of intensive SBP management with the potential side effects of increasing antihypertensive drugs in individual patients. 

Written by Julie McShane, Medical Writer 

Relevant topics that may be of interest to you:

Reference: Beddhu S, Rocco MV, Toto R, et al. Effects of intensive systolic blood pressure control on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in persons without kidney disease. Ann Int Med. 2017;167:375-383. doi:10.7326/M16-2966

Julie Mcshane MA MB BS
Julie Mcshane MA MB BS
Julie studied medicine at the Universities of Cambridge and London, UK. Whilst in medical practice, she developed an interest in medical writing and moved to a career in medical communications. She worked with companies in London and Hong Kong on a wide variety of medical education projects. Originally from Ireland, Julie is now based in Dublin, where she is a freelance medical writer. She enjoys contributing to the Medical News Bulletin to help provide a source of accurate and clear information about the latest developments in medical research.
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News and Articles

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS

Stay Connected
10,288FansLike
820FollowersFollow
249FollowersFollow
2,787FollowersFollow

Article of the month

Augmented Reality to Augment Physical Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease

A hallmark of advancing Parkinson’s disease is a distinctive shuffling walk. Dual-task training is an effective but costly physical therapy that helps people with...

Joke Of The Day – April 26

Doctor to his patient: -So, your diet is going to be – one apple, one boiled egg, fat free yogurt, and salad. -Doctor, am I supposed...

RECENT COMMENTS

ADVERTISE WITH US

error: Content is read-only and copy-protected.